Cerebral Hemorrhage
Description
- Many causes including hypertension, infarction, underlying malignancy, arteriovenous malformation, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, drug abuse, etc
- Highly vascularized malignant primary brain tumors tend to bleed spontaneously and should always be included in the differential diagnosis of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage
- Up to 10% of patients with a brain tumor can experience a diagnostic delay if CT is the only imaging modality
Pathology
- Variable depending on the underlying etiology
Clinical Features
- Symptoms
- Headache, sensorimotor deficits, altered mental status, herniation syndromes
- Age and gender
- Variable depending on the underlying etiology
- Prognosis
- Related to location and size
- Approximately 25% of patients die within the first 48 hours
Imaging
- General
- Round, oval, or irregular
- Location varies with etiology
- Hypertension: striatocapsular > thalamus > pons and cerebellum
- Thrombosis: follows arterial or venous territories
- Amyloid: peripheral/lobar
- Malformations and malignancies: any location
- Modality specific
- CT
- Hyperdense hematoma with surrounding hypodense edema in the acute setting
- Hematoma becomes less dense with time
- CTA/CTV
- Only helpful when thrombosis is suspected
- MRI
- Signal characteristics correspond to the age of the blood products
- Hyperacute (<24 hours)
- T1 isointense, T2 hyperintense
- Intracellular oxyhemoglobin
- Acute (24 hours to 3 days)
- T1 isointense, T2 hypointense
- Intracellular deoxyhemoglobin
- Early subacute (3–7 days)
- T1 hyperintense, T2 hypointense
- Intracellular methemoglobin
- Late subacute (7 days to 3 weeks)
- T1 hyperintense, T2 hyperintense
- Extracellular methemoglobin
- Chronic (>3 weeks)
- T1 and T2 hypointense
- Extracellular hemosiderin
- T2*
- Often hypointense signal, particularly with hemosiderin deposition
- Contrast
- Can demonstrate enhancement if underlying malignancy or vascular malformation
- Small amount of reactive enhancement can also be present around a subacute hematoma
- MRA/MRV
- Helpful when looking for thrombosis
- Conventional angiography
- Helpful when looking for thrombosis or underlying vascular malformation
- Dual-energy CT
- Can prove useful for rapidly identifying the underlying etiology
- Many recent studies have demonstrated the utility of dual-energy CT for detecting underlying vascular malformations and malignancy in the setting of an intracranial hemorrhage
- CT
- Imaging recommendations
- Start with NECT
- If etiology is clear from history, no need for further imaging
- If unclear, recommend CTA to evaluate for underlying vascular malformation or thrombosis
- MRI with contrast and T2* sequence
- If CT negative or etiology unclear
- If a vascular etiology is suspected, recommend CTA, MRA, or MRV
- Recommend follow-up MRI or DSA if etiology remains unclear, because a recent hematoma could mask an underlying tumor or vascular lesion
- Dual-energy CT can be a useful tool for detecting underlying tumors in patients with an intracranial hemorrhage of unknown origin
- Start with NECT
- Mimic
- On initial imaging, it can be difficult to distinguish bland hematoma from a vascular malformation or hemorrhagic neoplasm. If initial MRI or angiography is not helpful in delineating the underlying etiology, follow-up MRI or conventional angiography might be necessary. More recent studies suggest that initial evaluation with dual-energy or spectral CT could help identify the underlying etiology.
For more information, please see the corresponding chapter in Radiopaedia.
Contributor: Sean Dodson, MD
References
Bell D, Grant R, Collie D, et al. How well do radiologists diagnose intracerebral tumour histology on CT? Findings from a prospective multicentre study. Br J Neurosurg 2002;16:573–577.
Kim SJ, Lim HK, Lee HY, et al. Dual-energy CT in the evaluation of intracerebral hemorrhage of unknown origin: differentiation between tumor bleeding and pure hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:865–872. doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2890
Postma AA, Das M, Stadler AAR, et al. Dual-energy CT: what the neuroradiologist should know. Curr Radiol Rep 2015;3:16. doi.org/10.1007/s40134-015-0097-9
Please login to post a comment.